System and method of isolating component failures in an exhaust aftertreatment system

ABSTRACT

An apparatus includes a dosing module structured to suspend dosing in an exhaust aftertreatment system; a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) inlet NOx module structured to interpret SCR inlet NOx data and an SCR inlet temperature; a SCR outlet NOx module structured to interpret SCR outlet NOx data; and a system diagnostic module structured to determine an efficiency of a SCR system based on the SCR inlet and outlet NOx data over a range of SCR temperatures, wherein the system diagnostic module is further structured to determine a state of at least one of a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), a diesel particulate filter (DPF), and the SCR system based on the SCR efficiency at an elevated SCR temperature range and the SCR efficiency at a relatively lower SCR temperature range relative to a high SCR efficiency threshold and a low SCR efficiency threshold.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to diagnostic procedures for exhaustaftertreatment systems. More particularly, the present applicationrelates to a diagnostic procedure for isolating component failures in anexhaust aftertreatment system.

BACKGROUND

Emissions regulations for internal combustion engines have becomeincreasingly more stringent over recent years. Environmental concernshave motivated the implementation of stricter emission requirements forinternal combustion engines throughout much of the world. Governmentalagencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in theUnited States, carefully monitor the emission quality of engines and setemission standards to which engines must comply. Consequently, the useof exhaust aftertreatment systems on engines to reduce emissions isincreasing.

Exhaust aftertreatment systems are generally designed to reduce emissionof particulate matter, nitrogen oxides (NOx), hydrocarbons, and otherenvironmentally harmful pollutants. However, the components that make upthe exhaust aftertreatment system can be susceptible to failure anddegradation. Because the failure or degradation of components may haveadverse consequences on performance and the emission-reductioncapability of the exhaust aftertreatment system, the detection and, ifpossible, correction of failed or degraded components is desirable. Infact, some regulations require on-board diagnostic (OBD) monitoring ortesting of many of the components of the exhaust aftertreatment system.When equipped on vehicles, most monitoring and testing of aftertreatmentsystem components are performed during on-road operation of the vehicle(e.g., while the vehicle is being driven on the road). Although suchmonitoring and testing may be convenient, the efficacy of the monitoringand testing may be limited because the engine cannot be operated outsideof a given on-road calibrated operating range. Additionally, becauseon-road operating demands typically have priority over diagnostic andperformance recovery procedures, the order, timing, and control of suchprocedures may be less than ideal. As a result, the detection andcorrection of various failure modes in the exhaust aftertreatment systemmay be limited via OBD monitoring and testing.

SUMMARY

One embodiment relates to a system. The system includes an engine, anexhaust aftertreatment system, and a controller coupled to the engineand the exhaust aftertreatment system. The exhaust aftertreatment systemis in exhaust gas receiving communication with the engine, wherein theexhaust aftertreatment system includes a selective catalytic reduction(SCR) system, a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), and a catalyzed dieselparticulate filter (DPF). The controller is structured to: interpret afirst set of NOx data, the first set of NOx data including selectivecatalytic reduction (SCR) inlet NOx data and SCR outlet NOx data;determine that the exhaust aftertreatment system is purged of areductant deposit based on the first set of NOx data; interpret a secondset of NOx data corresponding to an elevated SCR inlet temperaturerange, the second set of NOx data including SCR inlet NOx data and SCRoutlet NOx data; determine a first SCR efficiency based on the secondset of NOx data; reduce a temperature of the exhaust gas flowing throughthe exhaust aftertreatment system; interpret a third set of NOx datacorresponding to a relatively lower SCR inlet temperature range, thethird set of NOx data including SCR inlet NOx data and SCR outlet NOxdata; determine a second SCR efficiency based on the third set of NOxdata; and determine a state of at least one of the DOC, DPF, and SCRsystem based on the first and second SCR efficiencies relative to a lowSCR efficiency threshold and a high SCR efficiency threshold. Byanalyzing the SCR efficiency over a range of SCR inlet temperatures, thecontroller is able to isolate component failures such that numerousother troubleshooting procedures may be avoided. In turn, a servicetechnician may diagnose the exhaust aftertreatment system relativelyquicker thereby saving a customer time and money.

Another embodiment relates to an apparatus. The apparatus includes adosing module structured to suspend dosing in an exhaust aftertreatmentsystem; a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) inlet NOx modulestructured to interpret SCR inlet NOx data from a SCR inlet NOx sensorand interpret an SCR inlet temperature; a SCR outlet NOx modulestructured to interpret SCR outlet NOx data from a SCR outlet NOxsensor; and a system diagnostic module structured to determine anefficiency of a SCR system based on the SCR inlet and outlet NOx dataover a range of SCR inlet temperatures, wherein the system diagnosticmodule is further structured to determine a state of at least one of adiesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), a diesel particulate filter (DPF), andthe SCR system based on the SCR efficiency at an elevated SCR inlettemperature range and the SCR efficiency at a relatively lower SCR inlettemperature range relative to a high SCR efficiency threshold and a lowSCR efficiency threshold.

Still another embodiment relates to a method. The method includespurging an exhaust aftertreatment system of a reductant deposit;interpreting a first set of NOx data, the first set of NOx dataincluding selective catalytic reduction (SCR) inlet NOx data and SCRoutlet NOx data; determining that the exhaust aftertreatment system ispurged of the reductant deposit based on the first set of NOx data;interpreting a second set of NOx data corresponding to an elevated SCRinlet temperature range, the second set of NOx data including SCR inletNOx data and SCR outlet NOx data; determining a first SCR efficiencybased on the second set of NOx data; reducing a temperature of theexhaust gas flowing through the exhaust aftertreatment system;interpreting a third set of NOx data corresponding to a relatively lowerSCR inlet temperature range, the third set of NOx data including SCRinlet NOx data and SCR outlet NOx data; determining a second SCRefficiency based on the third set of NOx data; and determining a stateof at least one of a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), a dieselparticulate filter (DPF), and a SCR system based on the first and secondSCR efficiencies relative to a low SCR efficiency threshold and a highSCR efficiency threshold.

These and other features, together with the organization and manner ofoperation thereof, will become apparent from the following detaileddescription when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an exhaust aftertreatment system with acontroller, according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the controller used with the system ofFIG. 1, according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 3 are graphs of a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systemdiagnostic test, according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 4 are graphs depicting an NO₂/NOx ratio and an efficiency of a SCRsystem as a function of SCR inlet temperature, according to an exampleembodiment.

FIG. 5 is a graph SCR inlet temperature during the SCR diagnostic testof FIG. 3, according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 6 is a graph of SCR efficiency versus SCR inlet temperature duringthe SCR diagnostic test of FIG. 3 for various healthy and degradedcomponents in an exhaust aftertreatment system, according to an exampleembodiment.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of a method of isolating degraded components inan exhaust aftertreatment system, according to an example embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS EMBODIMENTS

Referring to the figures generally, the various embodiments disclosedherein relate to systems and methods of identifying and isolatingpotential component failures in exhaust aftertreatment systems.According to the present disclosure, a controller performs an intrusivediagnostic procedure that manipulates the engine out exhaust gastemperature while simultaneously receiving nitrous oxide (NOx) dataentering and leaving a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system of anexhaust aftertreatment system. Based on the NOx data, the controllerdetermines an efficiency of the SCR system over a range of SCR inlettemperatures. Utilizing the SCR efficiency as a function of SCR inlettemperature data, the controller determines a state (e.g., degraded orhealthy) of at least one of a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), a dieselparticulate filter (DPF) system, and the SCR system. For example, thecontroller determines that only the DOC is in a healthy state based on alow SCR efficiency at a high SCR inlet temperature range and a marginalSCR efficiency at a low range of SCR inlet temperatures. In anotherexample, for low SCR efficiencies over a high SCR inlet temperaturerange, the controller determines that only the SCR system is in adegraded state. In other embodiments, other characteristic temperaturesmay be considered during the diagnostic procedure. For example, thecharacteristic temperature may include a temperature, either measured orestimated, in the middle of the SCR system. The diagnostic of the SCRsystem may also be based on a combination of temperatures across the SCRsystem (e.g., inlet, middle, outlet, etc.). As described more fullyherein, the controller uses this two-dimensional diagnostic feature(i.e., SCR efficiency as a function of SCR inlet temperature) todiagnose the state of the DOC, DPF, and/or SCR in an exhaustaftertreatment system. By identifying specific component failures in theexhaust aftertreatment, the controller alleviates the need for multiplediagnostic tests which may save time and money during thetroubleshooting process and minimize the use of resources (e.g.,controller bandwidth and memory in performing multiple diagnostics). Inother words, technically and advantageously, the controller of thepresent disclosure is structured to provide a relatively more efficientdiagnostic process by diagnosing a multitude of exhaust aftertreatmentcomponents in one process, which reduces the need for many diagnosticprocedures. This simplifies the diagnostic process and may allow servicetechnicians to service more vehicles throughout a workday while usersare able to minimize downtime (i.e., non-operational time) of theirengine-exhaust aftertreatment system. These and other features of thepresent disclosure are described more fully herein.

As used herein, the term “intrusive” (in regard to performing one ormore diagnostic tests) is used to refer to an active diagnostic test. Inother words, the intrusive method, system, and apparatus of the presentdisclosure describe a diagnostic test or protocol that is forced to runon the engine and exhaust aftertreatment system (i.e., causes the engineto operate at a certain speed, etc.). As a result, the active orintrusive diagnostic test is often run in a service bay or test centerenvironment. In comparison, a passive diagnostic test may be performedwhile the engine and exhaust aftertreatment system are operational. Forexample, if embodied in a vehicle, the passive test may be performedwhile the operator is driving the vehicle. If an error is detected, afault code or indicator lamp may be actuated to alert the operator ofmaintenance/service that may be required (e.g., an on-board diagnosticprocedure). According to the present disclosure, an intrusive method,system, and apparatus is utilized with an engine and exhaustaftertreatment system to manipulate the temperature of exhaust gas andtherefore, SCR inlet temperature, to identify and isolate specificcomponent failures within the exhaust aftertreatment system. Due tobeing an intrusive diagnostic, the method, system, and apparatus of thepresent disclosure may cause the overriding of various set engineoperating points. For example, many engine operating points are set tobe in compliance with one or more vehicular laws (e.g., emissions). Byoverriding one or more of these operating points, the engine may beforced into non-compliance with one or more vehicular laws. However,this intrusive test, procedure, and/or protocol allows for the effectiveisolation of component failures within the exhaust aftertreatmentsystem.

As also used herein, the term “degraded” in regard to a state of theDOC, DPF and/or SCR refers to that component operating outside one ormore passing/acceptable standards. The passing/acceptable standards maybe defined in the test diagnostic and/or via one or more inputs throughan input/output device, such as the input/output device 120 of FIG. 1.The passing/acceptable standard(s) refer to operating parameters of thecomponent that indicate whether that component is operational andtherefore, healthy (i.e., does not need to be further serviced,replaced, troubleshot, and/or checked). For example, a healthy SCR maycorrespond with an SCR efficiency at or above forty percent over allengine operating conditions; a healthy DOC may correspond with a fivepercent reduction in engine out NOx over all engine operatingconditions; etc.

Referring now to FIG. 1, an engine-exhaust aftertreatment system with acontroller is shown, according to an example embodiment. The enginesystem 10 includes an internal combustion engine 20 and an exhaustaftertreatment system 22 in exhaust gas-receiving communication with theengine 20. According to one embodiment, the engine 20 is structured as acompression-ignition internal combustion engine that utilizes dieselfuel. However, in various alternate embodiments, the engine 20 may bestructured as any other type of engine (e.g., spark-ignition) thatutilizes any type of fuel (e.g., gasoline). Within the internalcombustion engine 20, air from the atmosphere is combined with fuel, andcombusted, to power the engine. Combustion of the fuel and air in thecompression chambers of the engine 20 produces exhaust gas that isoperatively vented to an exhaust manifold and to the exhaustaftertreatment system 22.

In the example depicted, the exhaust aftertreatment system 22 includes adiesel particular filter (DPF) 40, a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) 30,a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system 52 with a SCR catalyst 50,and an ammonia oxidation (AMOx) catalyst 60. The SCR system 52 furtherincludes a reductant delivery system that has a diesel exhaust fluid(DEF) source 54 that supplies DEF to a DEF doser 56 via a DEF line 58.

In an exhaust flow direction, as indicated by directional arrow 29,exhaust gas flows from the engine 20 into inlet piping 24 of the exhaustaftertreatment system 22. From the inlet piping 24, the exhaust gasflows into the DOC 30 and exits the DOC into a first section of exhaustpiping 28A. From the first section of exhaust piping 28A, the exhaustgas flows into the DPF 40 and exits the DPF into a second section ofexhaust piping 28B. From the second section of exhaust piping 28B, theexhaust gas flows into the SCR catalyst 50 and exits the SCR catalystinto the third section of exhaust piping 28C. As the exhaust gas flowsthrough the second section of exhaust piping 28B, it is periodicallydosed with DEF by the DEF doser 56. Accordingly, the second section ofexhaust piping 28B acts as a decomposition chamber or tube to facilitatethe decomposition of the DEF to ammonia. From the third section ofexhaust piping 28C, the exhaust gas flows into the AMOx catalyst 60 andexits the AMOx catalyst into outlet piping 26 before the exhaust gas isexpelled from the exhaust aftertreatment system 22. Based on theforegoing, in the illustrated embodiment, the DOC 30 is positionedupstream of the DPF 40 and the SCR catalyst 50, and the SCR catalyst 50is positioned downstream of the DPF 40 and upstream of the AMOx catalyst60. However, in alternative embodiments, other arrangements of thecomponents of the exhaust aftertreatment system 22 are also possible

The DOC 30 may have any of various flow-through designs. Generally, theDOC 30 is structured to oxidize at least some particulate matter, e.g.,the soluble organic fraction of soot, in the exhaust and reduce unburnedhydrocarbons and CO in the exhaust to less environmentally harmfulcompounds. For example, the DOC 30 may be structured to decrease thehydrocarbon and CO concentrations in the exhaust to meet the requisiteemissions standards for those components of the exhaust gas. An indirectconsequence of the oxidation capabilities of the DOC 30 is the abilityof the DOC to oxidize NO into NO₂. In this manner, the level of NO₂exiting the DOC 30 is equal to the NO₂ in the exhaust gas generated bythe engine 20 plus the NO₂ converted from NO by the DOC.

In addition to treating the hydrocarbon and CO concentrations in theexhaust gas, the DOC 30 may also be used in the controlled regenerationof the DPF 40, SCR catalyst 50, and AMOx catalyst 60. This can beaccomplished through the injection, or dosing, of unburned HC into theexhaust gas upstream of the DOC 30. Upon contact with the DOC 30, theunburned HC undergoes an exothermic oxidation reaction which leads to anincrease in the temperature of the exhaust gas exiting the DOC 30 andsubsequently entering the DPF 40, SCR catalyst 50, and/or the AMOxcatalyst 60. The amount of unburned HC added to the exhaust gas isselected to achieve the desired temperature increase or targetcontrolled regeneration temperature.

The DPF 40 may be any of various flow-through or wall-flow designs, andis structured to decrease particulate matter concentrations, e.g., sootand ash, in the exhaust gas to meet or substantially meet requisiteemission standards. The DPF 40 captures particulate matter and otherconstituents, and thus may need to be periodically regenerated to burnoff the captured constituents. According to one embodiment, the DPF 40may be catalyzed. In turn, the DPF 40 may be configured to oxidize theparticulate matter (e.g., soot) entrapped by the filter to form NO₂independent of the DOC 30. The catalyst may be structured as any type ofcatalyst included with a DPF, such as platinum.

As discussed above, the SCR system 52 may include a reductant deliverysystem with a reductant (e.g., DEF) source 54, a pump and a deliverymechanism or doser 56. The reductant source 54 can be a container ortank capable of retaining a reductant, such as, for example, ammonia(NH₃), DEF (e.g., urea), or diesel oil. The reductant source 54 is inreductant supplying communication with the pump, which is configured topump reductant from the reductant source to the delivery mechanism 56via a reductant delivery line 58. The delivery mechanism 56 ispositioned upstream of the SCR catalyst 50. The delivery mechanism 56 isselectively controllable to inject reductant directly into the exhaustgas stream prior to entering the SCR catalyst 50. As described herein,the controller 100 is structured to control the timing and amount of thereductant delivered to the exhaust gas. In some embodiments, thereductant may either be ammonia or DEF, which decomposes to produceammonia. The ammonia reacts with NOx in the presence of the SCR catalyst50 to reduce the NOx to less harmful emissions, such as N₂ and H₂O. TheNOx in the exhaust gas stream includes NO₂ and NO. Generally, both NO₂and NO are reduced to N₂ and H₂O through various chemical reactionsdriven by the catalytic elements of the SCR catalyst in the presence ofNH₃.

The SCR catalyst 50 may be any of various catalysts known in the art.For example, in some implementations, the SCR catalyst 50 is avanadium-based catalyst, and in other implementations, the SCR catalystis a zeolite-based catalyst, such as a Cu-Zeolite or a Fe-Zeolitecatalyst.

The AMOx catalyst 60 may be any of various flow-through catalystsconfigured to react with ammonia to produce mainly nitrogen. The AMOxcatalyst 60 is structured to remove ammonia that has slipped through orexited the SCR catalyst 50 without reacting with NOx in the exhaust. Incertain instances, the exhaust aftertreatment system 22 may be operablewith or without an AMOx catalyst. Further, although the AMOx catalyst 60is shown as a separate unit from the SCR catalyst 50 in FIG. 1, in someimplementations, the AMOx catalyst may be integrated with the SCRcatalyst, e.g., the AMOx catalyst and the SCR catalyst can be locatedwithin the same housing. According to the present disclosure, the SCRcatalyst and AMOx catalyst are positioned serially, with the SCRcatalyst preceding the AMOx catalyst. In various other embodiments, theAMOx catalyst is not included in the exhaust aftertreatment system 22.In these embodiments, the NOx sensor 14 may be excluded from the exhaustaftertreatment system 22 as well.

Various sensors, such as NH₃ sensor 72, NOx sensors 12, 14, 55, 57 andtemperature sensors 16, 18, may be strategically disposed throughout theexhaust aftertreatment system 22 and may be in communication with thecontroller 100 to monitor operating conditions of the engine system 10.As shown, more than one NOx sensor may be positioned upstream anddownstream of the SCR catalyst 50. In this configuration, the NOx sensor12 measures the engine out NOx while the NOx sensor 55 measures the SCRcatalyst 50 inlet NOx amount, which is referred to as the SCR inlet NOxsensor 55 herein. Due to the DOC 30/DPF 40 potentially oxidizing someportion of the engine out NOx (e.g., NO, etc.), the proportions ofengine out NOx amounts (e.g., NO, NO₂, etc.) may not be equal to theproportions of SCR catalyst 50 inlet NOx amount. For example, NO may beoxidized to NO₂ in the DOC 30/DPF 40 such that the relative proportionsof NO, NO₂, etc. may not be equal to the original proportions from theengine, but the total concentration of NOx remains the same.Accordingly, this configuration accounts for this potential discrepancy.The NOx amount leaving the SCR catalyst 50 may be measured by the NOxsensor 57 and/or the NOx sensor 14. In some embodiments, there may beonly NOx sensor 57 or NOx sensor 14 depending on whether theconfiguration of the exhaust aftertreatment system 22 includes the AMOxcatalyst 60. The NOx sensor 57 is positioned downstream of the SCRcatalyst 50 and is structured to detect the concentration of NOx in theexhaust gas downstream of the SCR catalyst 50 (e.g., exiting the SCRcatalyst), which is referred to as the SCR outlet NOx sensor 57 herein.

The temperature sensors 16 are associated with the DOC 30 and DPF 40,and thus can be defined as the DOC/DPF temperature sensors 16. TheDOC/DPF temperature sensors are strategically positioned to detect thetemperature of exhaust gas flowing into the DOC 30, out of the DOC andinto the DPF 40, and out of the DPF before being dosed with DEF by thedoser 56. The temperature sensors 18 are associated with the SCRcatalyst 50 and AMOx catalyst 60 and thus can be defined as SCR/AMOxtemperature sensors 18. The SCR/AMOx temperature sensors 18 arestrategically positioned to detect the temperature of exhaust gasflowing into the SCR catalyst 50, out of the SCR catalyst 50, into theAMOx catalyst 60, and out of the AMOx catalyst 60. By way of example,temperature sensors may be strategically positioned before and after anycomponent within the exhaust aftertreatment system 22 such that thetemperature of the exhaust gas flowing into and out of any component maybe detected.

As shown in FIG. 1, a particulate matter (PM) sensor 70 is positioneddownstream of the SCR 50. According to one embodiment, the PM sensor 70is positioned in any position downstream of the DPF 40. Accordingly,other locations of the PM sensor 70 are also depicted in FIG. 1: afterthe DPF 40, after the AMOx catalyst 60, after the SCR catalyst 50, etc.In some embodiments, more than one PM sensor 70, as shown in FIG. 1, mayalso be included in the system. The PM sensor 70 is structured tomonitor particulate matter flowing through the exhaust aftertreatmentsystem 22. By monitoring the particulate matter, the PM sensor 70monitors the functionality of the DPF 40 and/or other components of theexhaust aftertreatment system 22.

Although the exhaust aftertreatment system 22 shown includes one of aDOC 30, DPF 40, SCR catalyst 50, and AMOx catalyst 60 positioned inspecific locations relative to each other along the exhaust flow path,in other embodiments, the exhaust aftertreatment system may include morethan one of any of the various catalysts positioned in any of variouspositions relative to each other along the exhaust flow path as desired.Further, although the DOC 30 and AMOx catalyst 60 are non-selectivecatalysts, in some embodiments, the DOC and AMOX catalyst can beselective catalysts.

FIG. 1 is also shown to include an operator input/output (I/O) device120. The operator I/O device 120 is communicably coupled to thecontroller 100, such that information may be exchanged between thecontroller 100 and the I/O device 120, wherein the information mayrelate to one or more components of FIG. 1 or determinations (describedbelow) of the controller 100. The operator I/O device 120 enables anoperator of the engine system 10 to communicate with the controller 100and one or more components of the engine system 10 of FIG. 1. Forexample, the operator input/output device 120 may include, but is notlimited to, an interactive display, a touchscreen device, one or morebuttons and switches, voice command receivers, etc. In various alternateembodiments, the controller 100 and components described herein may beimplemented with non-vehicular applications (e.g., a power generator).Accordingly, the I/O device may be specific to those applications. Forexample, in those instances, the I/O device may include a laptopcomputer, a tablet computer, a desktop computer, a phone, a watch, apersonal digital assistant, etc. Via the I/O device 120, the controller100 may provide a fault or service notification based on the determinedstate of the SCR catalysts 50 and the SCR inlet and outlet NOx sensors55 and 57 (in some embodiments, when the AMOx catalyst is included, theNOx sensor 14).

The controller 100 is structured to control the operation of the enginesystem 10 and associated sub-systems, such as the internal combustionengine 20 and the exhaust gas aftertreatment system 22. According to oneembodiment, the components of FIG. 1 are embodied in a vehicle. Invarious alternate embodiments, as described above, the controller 100may be used with any engine-exhaust aftertreatment system. The vehiclemay include an on-road or an off-road vehicle including, but not limitedto, line-haul trucks, mid-range trucks (e.g., pick-up trucks), tanks,airplanes, and any other type of vehicle that utilizes an exhaustaftertreatment system. Communication between and among the componentsmay be via any number of wired or wireless connections. For example, awired connection may include a serial cable, a fiber optic cable, a CAT5cable, or any other form of wired connection. In comparison, a wirelessconnection may include the Internet, Wi-Fi, cellular, radio, etc. In oneembodiment, a controller area network (CAN) bus provides the exchange ofsignals, information, and/or data. The CAN bus includes any number ofwired and wireless connections. Because the controller 100 iscommunicably coupled to the systems and components of FIG. 1, thecontroller 100 is structured to receive data from one or more of thecomponents shown in FIG. 1. For example, the data may include NOx data(e.g., an incoming NOx amount from SCR inlet NOx sensor 55 and anoutgoing NOx amount from SCR outlet NOx sensor 57), dosing data (e.g.,timing and amount of dosing delivered from doser 56), and vehicleoperating data (e.g., engine speed, vehicle speed, engine temperature,etc.) received via one or more sensors. As another example, the data mayinclude an input from operator input/output device 120. The structureand function of the controller 100 is further described in regard toFIG. 2.

As such, referring now to FIG. 2, an example structure for thecontroller 100 is shown according to one embodiment. As shown, thecontroller 100 includes a processing circuit 101 including a processor102 and a memory 103. The processor 102 may be implemented as ageneral-purpose processor, an application specific integrated circuit(ASIC), one or more field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), a digitalsignal processor (DSP), a group of processing components, or othersuitable electronic processing components. The one or more memorydevices 103 (e.g., RAM, ROM, Flash Memory, hard disk storage, etc.) maystore data and/or computer code for facilitating the various processesdescribed herein. Thus, the one or more memory devices 103 may becommunicably connected to the processor 102 and provide computer code orinstructions to the processor 102 for executing the processes describedin regard to the controller 100 herein. Moreover, the one or more memorydevices 103 may be or include tangible, non-transient volatile memory ornon-volatile memory. Accordingly, the one or more memory devices 103 mayinclude database components, object code components, script components,or any other type of information structure for supporting the variousactivities and information structures described herein.

The memory 103 is shown to include various modules for completing theactivities described herein. More particularly, the memory 103 includesmodules structured to diagnose and isolate component failures within theexhaust aftertreatment system 22. While various modules with particularfunctionality are shown in FIG. 2, it should be understood that thecontroller 100 and memory 103 may include any number of modules forcompleting the functions described herein. For example, the activitiesof multiple modules may be combined as a single module, additionalmodules with additional functionality may be included, etc. Further, itshould be understood that the controller 100 may further control othervehicle activity beyond the scope of the present disclosure.

Certain operations of the controller 100 described herein includeoperations to interpret and/or to determine one or more parameters.Interpreting or determining, as utilized herein, includes receivingvalues by any method known in the art, including at least receivingvalues from a datalink or network communication, receiving an electronicsignal (e.g. a voltage, frequency, current, or PWM signal) indicative ofthe value, receiving a computer generated parameter indicative of thevalue, reading the value from a memory location on a non-transientcomputer readable storage medium, receiving the value as a run-timeparameter by any means known in the art, and/or by receiving a value bywhich the interpreted parameter can be calculated, and/or by referencinga default value that is interpreted to be the parameter value.

As shown, the controller 100 includes a dosing module 104, an enginemodule 105, a SCR inlet NOx module 106, a SCR outlet NOx module 107, asystem diagnostic module 108, and a notification module 109. FIG. 3depicts an example diagnostic test protocol according to the presentdisclosure. To aid explanation of the present disclosure, FIG. 3 isexplained in regard to FIG. 2 and FIG. 1. The dosing module 104 isstructured to provide a dosing command to a reductant doser, such asdoser 56. The dosing command may include at least one of a command tosuspend reductant dosing injection into the exhaust flow and/or acommand to increase, decrease, or maintain a reductant dosing injectionrate/amount into the exhaust gas flow. According to another embodiment,the dosing command may further include a stoichiometric dosing command.The stoichiometric dosing command refers to the exact amount ofreductant needed to reduce all of the NOx amount present in the exhaustgas. In operation, the dosing module 104 is structured to receive NOxdata from NOx sensors 12 and 55 (e.g., the amount of NOx in the exhaustgas), such that the dosing module 104 determines the stoichiometricreductant amount for the current amount of NOx in the exhaust gas. Atstoichiometric conditions, all of the reductant is consumed by theexhaust gas (i.e., no extra reductant to therefore accumulate in the SCRsystem or slip into the SCR exhaust gas stream, etc.). As described morefully herein, to isolate a component failure in the exhaustaftertreatment system, the dosing module 104 is structured to firstsuspend reductant dosing and then resume dosing at stoichiometricconditions. The suspension of reductant dosing corresponds with portions311, 321, and 331 of graphs 310, 320, and 330 of FIG. 3.

The engine module 105 is structured to provide an engine operationcommand to the engine 20. The engine operation command is structured toadjust one or more operating parameters of the engine 20. The engineoperation command may include, but is not limited to, an ignition timingadjustment, an engine speed adjustment, an exhaust gas recirculation(EGR) flow amount adjustment, fuel injection timing adjustment, fuelinjection pressure adjustment, a fuel injection amount adjustment, anair flow amount, a number of fuel injection pulses, a fuel flow amount,and an engine torque output, among other alternatives. The engineoperation commands may be provided individually or with other commands.The extent to which any of the foregoing engine operation commands maybe used and in what combination may vary based on engine design and/orengine application. Each of the foregoing engine operation commands maybe implemented to increase the temperature of the aftertreatment system22. According to one embodiment, the engine operation commands arestructured to purge or substantially purge residual reductant depositsin the SCR system 52. According to the example depicted in FIG. 3, theengine module 105 is structured to provide an engine operation commandto the engine 20 to run the engine for a predetermined amount of time(e.g., twenty minutes, which corresponds with portion 311) at apredetermined engine speed (e.g., approximately 1000revolutions-per-minute (RPM)). In FIG. 3, the engine module 105 providesa relatively constant engine speed command. In various otherembodiments, the commanded speed and duration may vary based on theapplication. As seen in graph 320, the combination of the suspension ofdosing and operating the engine at a preset speed for a predeterminedamount of time causes the temperature (portion 321) of the exhaust gasto increase (e.g., a temperature controlled mode, etc.). The increase inexhaust gas temperature burns off residual reductant amounts in theexhaust aftertreatment system.

The SCR inlet NOx module 106 is structured to receive and store measuredexhaust NOx amount data entering the SCR system (e.g., SCR system 52),such as inlet NOx data 112. Thus, the SCR inlet NOx module 106 may becommunicably coupled to the SCR inlet NOx sensor 55. The SCR inlet NOxmodule 106 is also structured to receive and store SCR inlet temperaturedata 114. The SCR inlet temperature data 114 corresponds with thetemperature of the exhaust gas entering the SCR system 52. Accordingly,the SCR inlet NOx module 106 may also be communicably coupled to the SCRinlet temperature sensor 18. The SCR outlet NOx module 107 is structuredto receive and store the measured exhaust NOx data, such as outlet NOxdata 116, exiting the SCR system 52. Thus, the SCR outlet module 107 maybe communicably coupled to the SCR outlet NOx sensor 57. The SCR outletNOx module 107 may also be structured to receive and store SCR outlettemperature data 118. The SCR outlet temperature data 118 correspondswith the temperature of the exhaust gas leaving the SCR system 52.Accordingly, the SCR outlet NOx module 107 may also be communicablycoupled to the SCR outlet temperature sensor 18. The rate at which theNOx data (e.g., SCR inlet and outlet NOx data 112 and 116, etc.) may bemeasured and stored within each of the modules 106 and 107 may bedependent on the sampling rate of the respective NOx sensors being usedin the exhaust aftertreatment system 22. In one embodiment, the data maybe acquired at a rate substantially close to the maximum sampling rateof the sensors. In other embodiments, the data may be measured andprovided periodically (e.g., every 5 seconds, etc.). The sampling ratemay be predefined within the controller 100 or a user may define thesampling rate via the operator I/O device 120.

In certain embodiments, the SCR inlet NOx module 106 and the SCR outletNOx module 107 are structured to continuously acquire SCR inlet NOx data112 and SCR outlet NOx data 114. The inlet and outlet NOx data may beprovided to the system diagnostic module 108.

Applicant has determined and recognizes that the NO₂/NOx ratio affectsthe rate of reactions within the SCR system, which therefore impacts SCRefficiency. The following equations list some of the most prevalentreactions that occur within the SCR system 52 and their associatedNO₂/NOx ratio and ANR value. In the equations below, the SCR system 52uses ammonia (NH₃) as the catalyzing agent to reduce NOx:

$\begin{matrix}{{{4{NO}} + {4{NH}_{3}} + O_{2}}->{{4N_{2}} + {6H_{2}O\mspace{14mu}\left( {{{standard}\mspace{14mu}{reaction}},{\frac{{NO}_{2}}{{NO}x} = 0},\;{{ANR} = 1}} \right)}}} & \lbrack 1\rbrack \\{{{NO} + {NO}_{2} + {2{NH}_{3}}}->{{2N_{2}} + {3H_{2}O\mspace{14mu}\left( {{{fast}\mspace{14mu}{reaction}},{\frac{{NO}_{2}}{{NO}x} = 0.5},\;{{ANR} = 1}} \right)}}} & \lbrack 2\rbrack\end{matrix}$

$\begin{matrix}{{{6{NO}_{2}} + {8{NH}_{3}}}->{{7N_{2}} + {12H_{2}O\mspace{14mu}\left( {{{slow}\mspace{14mu}{reaction}},{\frac{{NO}_{2}}{{NO}x} = 1},{{ANR} = 1.33}} \right)}}} & \lbrack 3\rbrack\end{matrix}$Generally speaking, faster reactions use a relatively lesser amount ofSCR catalyst volume to complete, which therefore increases SCRefficiency. In regard to equation [2], this reaction occurs at a fastrate and consumes NO and NO₂ in equal amounts. Therefore, a NO₂/NOxratio of 0.5 is an optimum ratio: higher or lower is sub-optimal.According to the present disclosure, the controller 100 is structured touse the effect that the NO₂/NOx ratio has on the SCR at relatively lowtemperatures to aid diagnosis of at least one of the SCR, DOC, and DPFsystem (i.e., the low temperature range described herein).

In operation of the engine-aftertreatment system, only a small amount ofNO₂ is emitted from the engine 20. However, NO is oxidized to NO₂ in theDOC 30 and, to a lesser extent, in the DPF 40 (i.e., the DPF iscatalyzed as described above). At low temperatures, the SCR efficiencymay be strongly affected by low NO oxidation. While the Applicant notesthat the NO₂/NOx ratio is difficult and likely impracticable to bedetermined in the field without connecting complex and expensiveinstrumentation to system, Applicant also recognizes that NO oxidationto NO₂ (the NO₂/NOx ratio at SCR inlet) is a critical parameter for thefunction of the SCR system. Recognizing the importance of the NO₂/NOxratio and appreciating the impracticability of determining this value inthe field, the system diagnostic module 108 is structured to determinethe SCR efficiency at a low temperature range where SCR function is mostsensitive to NO₂/NOx ratio. In other words, the system diagnostic module108 determines the SCR efficiency at the low temperature range describedherein because at this temperature range, SCR efficiency is sensitive tothe NO₂/NOx ratio, such that the diagnostic determinations are at leastpartly based on an inferred NO₂/NOx ratio, without actually determiningthe NO₂/NOx ratio. Because the NO₂/NOx ratio is affected by theoxidation occurring in the DOC, the system diagnostic module 108 is ableto correlate low SCR efficiency at the low temperature range with adegraded DOC based on the determined SCR efficiency. As described belowand herein, the system diagnostic module 108 uses a two-dimensionaldiagnostic feature, such that the system diagnostic module 108 alsodetermines the SCR efficiency at an elevated temperature range. Usingthe two-dimensional diagnostic feature, the system diagnostic module 108is able to accurately and efficiently diagnose one or moreaftertreatment components (i.e., the multiple determinations act asverification determinations to support and confirm each diagnosticdetermination). Thus, while understanding the NO₂/NOx ratio supports theconclusions drawn herein in regard to the systems and methods described,the NO₂/NOx ratio is not measured or otherwise explicitly determinedduring the described systems and methods. Instead, Applicant hasdetermined the temperature range where the SCR efficiency will bestrongly affected by low NO oxidation (i.e., the relatively lower SCRinlet temperature range). Thus, according to the present disclosure, thecontroller 100 is structured to use the effect that the NO₂/NOx ratiohas on the SCR at relatively low temperature to aid diagnosis of atleast one of the SCR, DOC, and DPF system (i.e., the low temperaturerange described herein).

Referring now to FIG. 4, a graph 400 of SCR inlet temperature versusNO₂/NOx ratio is shown according to one embodiment. As shown, atrelatively lower SCR inlet temperatures (e.g., below 250 degreesCelsius), NO oxidation to NO₂ is occurring at a low rate. For example,the optimum NO₂/NOx ratio (0.5) may still be achieved near 250 degreesCelsius in curve 401 (representing a healthy SCR and DOC/DPF system).Curve 402 represents a degraded DOC and DPF system, but a degraded DOCand DPF system. Relative to curve 401, there is a loss of NO oxidation,from optimal to sub-optimal, near 250 degrees Celsius. In either case,increasing the aftertreatment system temperature affects the NO₂/NOxratio as shown by curves 401 and 402. The corresponding SCR efficiencyfor the each case is shown in graph 420, where the same healthy SCR unitwas tested for both cases. The healthy SCR unit is evidenced by similarSCR efficiency in the range of 400-450 degrees Celsius on both curves422 and 424. As a result, examination of SCR efficiency with regards tothe impact of the NO₂/NOx ratio may be inconclusive at elevatedtemperature ranges. According to the present disclosure, the controller100 is structured to use SCR efficiencies determined over a range of SCRinlet temperatures to isolate a degraded component to at least one ofthe SCR, DOC, and the DPF. In some embodiments, the controller 100 isstructured to use the determined NO₂/NOx ratio at relatively lowtemperatures (e.g., around 250 degrees Celsius) to aid the diagnosisdetermination (described more fully herein).

Referring further to FIG. 2, the system diagnostic module 108 isstructured to determine that the exhaust aftertreatment system is purgedor substantially purged of reductant deposits. According to oneembodiment, the system diagnostic module 108 performs a NOx sensorrationality test to determine that the exhaust aftertreatment system ispurged of the residual reductant deposits. The NOx sensor rationalitytest may be based on the SCR inlet and outlet NOx data 112 and 116.Accordingly, the system diagnostic module 108 is structured to receiveSCR inlet and outlet NOx data 112 and 116 from modules 106 and 107. Bysuspending the reductant dosing, the SCR NOx sensors should measureapproximately the same levels of NOx in the exhaust flow if each sensoris functioning properly. This is due to no reduction in NOx over the SCRcatalyst due to no dosing. However, there still may be trace amounts ofreductant (e.g., ammonia) present in the SCR system that cause oxidationof the NOx in the exhaust gas flow such that the measurements from theSCR inlet and outlet sensors may not be exactly equal.

According to one embodiment, the system diagnostic module 108 determinesthat the residual reductant amount has been purged or substantiallypurged if the SCR inlet NOx amount is approximately equal to the SCRoutlet NOx amount for a predetermined amount of time (i.e., the NOxsensor rationality test). The definition of “approximately” may varybased on the application. However, according to one embodiment,“approximately” may be defined as plus-or-minus five percent of the SCRinlet NOx amount. In FIG. 3, the NOx sensor rationality test correspondswith portion 312 where the preset amount of time is approximately twominutes. In other embodiments, the preset amount of time may differbased on the application. If the SCR inlet NOx amount is notapproximately equal to the SCR outlet NOx for the predetermined amountof time, the system diagnostic module 108 may provide a command tocontinue to suspend reductant dosing and operate the engine for anotherpreset length of time prior to re-running the NOx sensor rationalitytest. If after the predetermined amount of time the SCR inlet NOx amountis still not approximately equal to the SCR outlet NOx amount, thesystem diagnostic module 108 may at least one of determine that one orboth of the SCR NOx sensors is faulty and/or re-run the test again.

According to various other embodiments, the system diagnostic module 108may perform any type diagnostic procedure in addition to and/or in placeof the NOx sensor rationality test in order to determine that theresidual reductant deposits have been substantially purged from theaftertreatment system. In various alternate embodiments, a servicetechnician may replace one or more exhaust aftertreatment systemcomponents and/or physically remove the reductant deposits and via I/Odevice 120 inform the controller 100 that the reductant deposits areremoved from the system, such that the diagnostic protocol may continue.All such variations are intended to fall within the spirit and scope ofthe present disclosure.

After the system diagnostic module 108 determines that the residualreductant deposits in the exhaust aftertreatment system 22 have beenpurged and the NOx sensors are functioning correctly, the dosing module104 performs an ammonia-to-NOx (ANR) ratio sweep diagnostic. Thiscorresponds with portion 313 of graph 310. During the sweep, the dosingmodule 104 adjusts the amount of reductant injected as shown by thechanging ANR in portion 332 of graph 330. This sweep is structured tomonitor the operability of the doser (e.g., doser 56), and detect anyother conditions that prevent achieving the correct reactionstoichiometry in the SCR catalyst 50. The sweep is a pre-condition forsuccessful diagnosis of the catalyst elements, similar to rationality ofthe NOx sensors or purging stored reductant from the aftertreatmentsystem 22.

After completion of the ANR sweep, the dosing module 104 is structuredto suspend dosing again and the engine module 105 is structured to runthe engine at a predetermined speed for a preset amount of time again topurge any reductant deposits that may have resulted from the ANR sweep.This portion of the diagnostic protocol corresponds with portion 314 ofgraph 310 of FIG. 3. The engine set speed and time may vary based on theapplication just like the initial purging. At this point, the exhaustaftertreatment is at an elevated temperature range and substantiallypurged from any reductant deposits.

In addition to performing a NOx sensor rationality test to verifyoperability of the SCR inlet and outlet NOx sensors and confirm that thesystem has been substantially purged from all reductant deposits, thesystem diagnostic module 108 is also structured to determine anefficiency of the SCR system. According to one embodiment, the systemdiagnostic module 108 is structured to determine the efficiency as afunction of SCR inlet temperature (e.g., from module 106). The SCRefficiency determination is based on the SCR inlet and outlet NOx data112 and 116. Based on the determined SCR efficiency as a function of SCRinlet temperature for a range of SCR inlet temperatures, the systemdiagnostic module 108 is structured to isolate a component failure to atleast one of a SCR system, the DOC, and the DPF. This corresponds withportion 315 of graph 310 where the catalysts are evaluated and the rangeof temperatures is shown in the corresponding portion 322 of graph 320(FIG. 3). As mentioned above, after the second purging of the system ofthe reductant deposits, the exhaust aftertreatment system is at anelevated temperature range. To decrease the temperature of the exhaustaftertreatment system to determine SCR efficiency at a relatively lowertemperature range, the engine module 105 and dosing module 104 mayprovide a series of commands that are described below. According to oneembodiment, the system diagnostic module 108 isolates component failuresin the exhaust aftertreatment system 22 based on the determined SCRefficiency as a function of SCR inlet temperature relative to predefinedhigh and low SCR efficiency thresholds (referring to herein as a “lowSCR efficiency threshold” and a “high SCR efficiency threshold”). Thehigh and low SCR efficiency thresholds may be predefined via I/O device120.

According to one embodiment, the SCR efficiency may be defined as theintegrated change in molar flux of NOx between the SCR inlet(NOx_(inlet)) and the SCR outlet (NOx_(outlet)), divided by the totalNOx amount entering the SCR (NOx_(inlet)) over a predefined interval(i=0 to time, T). An example determination is represented in equation[1] below.

$\begin{matrix}{{{SCR}\mspace{14mu}{Efficiency}\mspace{14mu}(\%)} = {\int_{i = 0}^{i = T}{\frac{\left\lbrack {{{NO}x},{inlet},{i - {{NO}x}},{outlet},i} \right\rbrack}{{{NO}x},{inlet},i}*100}}} & \lbrack 1\rbrack\end{matrix}$The determined SCR efficiency provides an indication of the efficacy ofthe SCR system. For example, a relatively higher efficiency indicatesthat a substantial amount of the NOx present in the exhaust stream isbeing reduced to nitrogen and other less pollutant compounds. However, arelatively lower efficiency indicates that the NOx in the exhaust gasstream is substantially not being converted to nitrogen and other lesspollutant compounds in the SCR system. According to various alternateembodiments, the SCR efficiency may be determined by any other formula,algorithm, look-up table, and the like.

With the above in mind, first, the system diagnostic module 108determines an SCR efficiency at an elevated temperature range. Asmentioned above, after the ANR sweep and the second purging, the SCRinlet temperature is at an elevated temperature range which is at ornear when the first SCR efficiency is determined. According to oneembodiment, the elevated temperature range corresponds with SCR inlettemperatures from approximately (i.e., plus-or-minus 25 degrees Celsius)400 to 550 degrees Celsius. Referring now to FIG. 5 in connection withFIGS. 1-3, a graph 500 of a cooling phase 510 for the exhaustaftertreatment is shown according to one embodiment. The cooling phaseportion 510 corresponds with portion 322 of graph 320 in FIG. 3 (e.g., aquenching mode, etc.). Accordingly, the system diagnostic module 108determines an SCR efficiency corresponding to portion 511 of graph 500(the “first SCR efficiency,” which is at the elevated temperaturerange). Second, the system diagnostic module 108 determines an SCRefficiency at a relatively cooler SCR inlet temperature range (the“second SCR efficiency corresponding with portion 512 of graph 500).According to one embodiment, the relatively cooler SCR inlet temperaturerange corresponds with a temperature range of approximately 225 degreesCelsius to 275 degrees Celsius. Based on the determined first and secondSCR efficiencies relative to at least one of the high and low SCRthresholds, the system diagnostic module 108 determines whether at leastone of the SCR, DOC, and DPF systems are in a degraded state. Accordingto various alternate embodiments, the system diagnostic module 108 maydetermine the SCR efficiency at a median temperature range (e.g.,portion 513) to also aid diagnosis the system. The degraded and/orhealthy state determinations are described below in regard to FIG. 6.

As mentioned above, the engine module 105 is structured to cool orquench the system. To quench, the engine module 105 provides an engineoperation command to increase exhaust gas flow and reduce exhaust gastemperatures. The controller 100 may provide any engine operationcommand (e.g., engine speed adjustment, ignition timing adjustment, EGRflow adjustment, etc.) that increases a NOx amount out of the engine andmaximizes exhaust gas flow to quench the exhaust gas aftertreatmentsystem (e.g., by flowing relatively cooler exhaust gas over the systemcomponents, etc.). The command to increase exhaust gas flow and a NOxamount out of the engine may include, but is not limited to, suspendingexhaust gas recirculation (EGR) to the engine and elevating the enginespeed while operating the engine under a no or low load condition. Thisis due to the diagnostic procedure of the present disclosure beingstructured as an intrusive diagnostic. Accordingly, the procedure isperformed in a service center environment, such that the engine speedmay be manipulated while the load on the engine stays relatively low. Inthe example of FIG. 3, the engine speed is increased to approximately1800 RPM. However, in various other embodiments, the engine speed may beincreased to any other speed.

According to one embodiment, the dosing module 104 provides a command toresume dosing at stoichiometric conditions (i.e., a stoichiometricdosing command), such that SCR efficiency determination process maybegin. Because the system is at least substantially purged fromreductant deposits, dosing at stoichiometric conditions is at leastpartly intended to ensure that all the reductant is consumed in the SCRreactions, such that no extra reductant accumulates within the system. Aresult of the suspension of EGR, resuming dosing, and increasing enginespeed is relatively lower exhaust gas temperatures that cool or quenchthe exhaust gas aftertreatment system.

As mentioned above, the degraded and/or healthy state determinations maybe more fully explained in regard to FIG. 6. Accordingly, referring nowto FIG. 6, a graph 600 of curves (e.g., curves 601-604) of SCRefficiency versus SCR inlet temperature for a healthy system 601, ahealthy DOC and a degraded DPF and SCR system 602, a degraded DOC andDPF and a healthy SCR 603, and a degraded SCR and DOC/DPF system 604.FIG. 6 also depicts an example high SCR efficiency threshold of 0.7(605), a low SCR efficiency threshold of 0.5 (606) with a high elevatedtemperature (portion 610 corresponding to approximately 400 to 550degrees Celsius) and a relatively low temperature (portion 611corresponding to approximately 225 to 275 degrees Celsius). While thedeterminations below are described generically in regard to high/low SCRefficiency thresholds and elevated/low temperature ranges, thepreviously mentioned values may be substituted in for these genericdescriptions according to one example embodiment described herein (i.e.,a high SCR efficiency threshold of 0.7, etc.). In various otherembodiments, the values for various variables (e.g., elevatedtemperature range) may be different based on the application (e.g., ahigh SCR efficiency threshold of 0.8 and a low SCR efficiency thresholdof 0.6) than those described and used herein. All such applicationspecific variations are intended to fall within the spirit and scope ofthe present disclosure.

With reference to graph 600, according to one embodiment, the systemdiagnostic module 108 only determines that the SCR system is in adegraded state based on the SCR efficiency (i.e., the first SCRefficiency) being below the low SCR efficiency threshold (line 606) atthe SCR elevated temperature range (portion 610). At elevated SCR inlettemperatures, the SCR has low sensitivity to the NO₂/NOx ratio. The SCRefficiency is relatively insensitive to the NO₂/NOx ratio because thekinetics of the SCR reactions (e.g., eqs. [1]-[3], etc.) become fasterwith increased temperature. As the reactions speed up, efficiency willincrease regardless of the NO₂/NOx ratio, making the NO₂/NOx ratio arelatively less significant factor in SCR efficiency. At hightemperatures (e.g., the elevated temperature range), the DOC/DPFcatalysts are inhibited such that a high NO₂/NOx ratio cannot be createdeven if the DOC/DPF is healthy. Accordingly, the SCR system has lowsensitivity to the NO₂/NOx ratio at high temperatures. Therefore, if theSCR efficiency is below the low SCR efficiency threshold at the highelevated temperature range, the system diagnostic module 108 determinesthat only the SCR is in a degraded state. Because the SCR efficiency isrelatively insensitive to the NO₂/NOx ratio at higher temperatures, SCRefficiency does not indicate the health of the DOC and DPF at highertemperatures. Accordingly, the system diagnostic module 108 onlydetermines that the SCR is in a degraded state based on the first SCRefficiency being below the low SCR efficiency threshold.

While the aforementioned determination is based on a single data point(i.e., an SCR efficiency at an elevated SCR inlet temperature relativeto a low SCR efficiency threshold), the system diagnostic module 108 isstructured to make the other determinations described herein in regardto at least two diagnostic data points (e.g., a two-dimensionaldiagnostic feature). These determinations are explained and shown inregard to curves 601-604. Curve 601 represents a healthy SCR, DOC, andDPF system. The system diagnostic module 108 determines that the SCR,DOC, and DPF systems are in a healthy state based on the first andsecond SCR efficiencies being approximately at or above the high SCRefficiency threshold. The system diagnostic module 108 is structured todetermine that only the DOC is in a healthy state (i.e., at least one ofthe DPF and SCR are in degraded states) based on the first SCRefficiency being below the high SCR efficiency threshold and the secondSCR efficiency being approximately within a marginal SCR efficiencyrange (portion 612). According to one embodiment, the marginal SCRefficiency range corresponds to SCR efficiency values above the low SCRefficiency threshold. In this example, the marginal SCR efficiency rangecorresponds to 0.5 to 0.6, where approximately indicates plus-or-minus0.09. This condition corresponds to curve 602. The system diagnosticmodule 108 is structured to determine that both the DOC and the DPF arein a degraded state based on first efficiency being approximately at orabove the high SCR efficiency threshold and the second SCR efficiencybeing approximately at or above the low SCR efficiency threshold. Thiscondition corresponds with curve 603. The system diagnostic module 108is structured to determine that the SCR, DOC, and DPF are all in adegraded state based on the first SCR efficiency being below the highSCR efficiency threshold and the second SCR efficiency being at or belowthe low SCR efficiency threshold. This condition corresponds with curve604.

As mentioned above, at the elevated temperature range, the SCR has lowsensitivity to the NO₂/NOx ratio. Accordingly, even if the DOC/DPF arein a healthy state, their oxidation function has little to no impact onthe determined SCR efficiency. As shown in FIG. 6, curves 601 and 603indicate healthy SCR systems while curves 602 and 604 indicate SCRsystems in a degraded state. Accordingly, SCR efficiency at elevatedtemperature provides the diagnostic module 108 with an effectivediagnostic feature for the SCR system. However, at low temperatures, theSCR has a greater sensitivity to the NO₂/NOx ratio. Accordingly, toisolate failures, the diagnostic module 108 utilizes a two-dimensionaldiagnostic feature (SCR efficiency at high and low SCR inlettemperatures) in order to substantially capture the nuances of curves601-604. To achieve a high SCR efficiency at relatively low SCR inlettemperatures, substantial reductant coverage is needed in the SCR system(not present here due to the purging) or the NO₂/NOx ratio must be nearthe optimum value of 0.5. This is more clearly shown in graph 420 ofFIG. 4, where at low temperatures, sub-optimal NO₂/NOx ratios result inrelatively lower SCR efficiencies. The optimal NO₂/NOx ratio isindicated at point 421 on curve 422, which corresponds with curve 401(curve 424 corresponds with curve 402). To isolate between whether theDOC, DPF, or both are the cause of the low SCR efficiency, the systemdiagnostic module 108 examines the SCR efficiency at the low temperature(i.e., the second SCR efficiency). As shown in curve 602, a healthy DOCcorresponds with a second SCR efficiency at or above the low SCRefficiency. It is important to note that isolating low SCR efficiency atlow temperature to either a degraded DOC or DPF individually may not bepossible and it may be necessary to replace both componentssimultaneously to repair the system or replace a single component andrepeat the test.

Referring back to FIG. 2, based on the state determined by the systemdiagnostic module 108, the notification module 109 is structured toprovide one or more notifications. The notifications may provide anindication of whether the SCR system, DOC system, and/or DPF systemneeds to be serviced (i.e., checked, replaced, additionaltroubleshooting needed, etc.). The notifications may be provided to anI/O device 120 and/or to any device of the service technician whoperformed the diagnostic procedure.

Referring now to FIG. 7, a flowchart of a method 700 of diagnosing atleast one of a SCR, DOC, and DPF system in an exhaust aftertreatmentsystem is shown according to an example embodiment. In one exampleembodiment, method 700 may be implemented with the controller 100 ofFIG. 1. Accordingly, method 700 may be described in regard to FIGS. 1-6.

At process 701, reductant dosing is suspended in the exhaustaftertreatment system. According to one embodiment, the controller 100provides a command to a reductant doser to stop reductant injectionsinto the exhaust gas stream. At process 702, the exhaust aftertreatmentsystem is purged of reductant deposits. According to one embodiment, thereductant deposits are purged by increasing the exhaust gas temperaturesto increase the temperature of the components in the exhaust gasaftertreatment to burn off the reductant deposits. The controller 100may provide a command to increase engine speed while the dosing issuspended in order to increase exhaust gas temperatures. In otherembodiments, the controller 100 may provide any other command structuredto increase exhaust gas temperatures.

At process 703, a first set of NOx data is interpreted (e.g., receivedfrom SCR inlet and outlet NOx sensors). The first set of NOx dataincludes SCR inlet NOx data (e.g., SCR inlet NOx data 112, etc.) and SCRoutlet NOx data (e.g., SCR outlet NOx data 116, etc.). From the firstset of NOx data, the rationality of the NOx sensors (e.g.,functionality, operability, etc.) may be determined. If the NOx sensorsare determined to be faulty, each may be replaced and the testing re-run(e.g., return to process 701, etc.). Conversely, if the NOx sensors areoperational, the testing continues to process 704. At process 704, thecontroller 100 determines that the exhaust gas aftertreatment system isnot purged of reductant deposits based on the first set of NOx data.According to one embodiment, the controller 100 determines that theexhaust aftertreatment system is not purged by performing a SCR NOxsensor rationality test, as described above. While dosing is suspended,the SCR inlet NOx sensor should measure approximately the same amount ofNOx as the SCR outlet NOx sensor for a predetermined amount of time. Asmentioned above, even though dosing is suspended, the NOx amounts maynot be exactly equal due to trace reductant amounts present in thesystem that were not purged. If the SCR inlet NOx amount is notapproximately equal to an SCR outlet NOx amount, the controller 100determines reductant deposits are still in the system. Determination ofwhether SCR inlet NOx amount is approximately equal (or not equal) tothe SCR outlet NOx amount may vary based on the application and/or anypreset via, e.g., the I/O device 120. For example, one embodiment maydesignate measurements within five percent to indicate that the systemhas been purged. Another embodiment may designate measurements withinfifteen percent to indicate that the system has been purged. In anyevent, if the controller 100 determines that the system is not purgedbased on, in this case, the NOx sensor rationality test, processes701-703 may re-run. These processes may be re-run until the system ispurged and/or a determination is made that an issue exists with the NOx.

In comparison, at process 705, a determination is made that the exhaustaftertreatment system is purged of the reductant deposits based on thefirst set of NOx data. At which point, the evaluation of the DOC, DPF,and SCR may then occur. At process 706, a second set of NOx data isinterpreted, the second set of NOx data corresponding to SCR inlet NOxdata 112 and SCR outlet NOx data 116. Because the second set of NOx datais received following the purging of the exhaust aftertreatment system,the second set of NOx data corresponds to an elevated temperature range(in regard to an SCR inlet temperature). The second set of NOx data isused to establish the health of the dosing system and whether there areissues in dosing at the desired ANR. If issues are discovered, thecondition is corrected and processes 701-706 may re-run. Based on thesecond set of NOx data, a first SCR efficiency is determined (707) thatcorresponds to an elevated SCR inlet temperature range. According to oneembodiment, the elevated temperature range corresponds with portion 610of graph 600 (i.e., approximately 400 to 550 degrees Celsius).

At process 708, the engine out exhaust gas temperatures are decreased inorder to quench the SCR system. By cooling the exhaust gas temperatures,the SCR inlet temperature also decreases. This is indicated in portion510 of graph 500 of FIG. 5. Quenching the SCR system, may be performedby reducing the temperature of the exhaust gas flowing through theexhaust gas aftertreatment system via one or more engine operationcommands provided by the controller 100. As mentioned above, the engineoperation commands may include, but are not limited to, increasingengine speed while operating the engine at a no to low load operatingcondition. According to one embodiment, dosing is resumed atstoichiometric conditions (in some embodiments, approximately atstoichiometric conditions (e.g., off of stoichiometric conditions byless than five percent) (process 709). As mentioned above, this is toensure or substantially ensure that all the reductant injected is usedto decrease the NOx amounts in the exhaust gas stream.

At process 710, a third set of NOx data is interpreted. At process 711,the controller 100 determines a second SCR efficiency based on the thirdset of NOx data, which corresponds to a relatively lower range of SCRinlet temperature (i.e., portion 611 of graph 600). The third set of NOxdata thereby facilitates the determination of the SCR efficiency overtwo temperature ranges, as indicated by portions 610 and 611 of graph600.

At process 712, a state is determined for at least one of a dieseloxidation catalyst (DOC), a diesel particulate filter (DPF), and a SCRsystem based on the first and second SCR efficiencies relative to a lowSCR efficiency threshold and a high SCR efficiency threshold. The statedesignation may include healthy or degraded. In various otherembodiments, the state designation may also include a state in-betweenhealthy and degraded, such as further inspection needed. The determinedstate may be provided to a technician performing method 700.

According to one embodiment, the high SCR efficiency threshold isapproximately 0.7 and the low SCR efficiency is approximately 0.5. Inone embodiment, approximately refers to plus-or-minus 0.09. In thiscase, the state determinations may follow the state determinationsdescribed above. For example, the controller 100 only determines thatthe SCR system is in a degraded state based on the first SCR efficiencybeing below the low SCR efficiency threshold; that the SCR, DOC, and DPFsystems are in a healthy state based on the first and second SCRefficiencies being approximately at or above the high SCR efficiencythreshold; that only the DOC is in a healthy state based on the firstSCR efficiency being below the high SCR efficiency threshold and thesecond SCR efficiency being within a marginal SCR efficiency range(e.g., 0.5-0.6); that both the DOC and the DPF are in a degraded statebased on first efficiency being approximately at or above the high SCRefficiency threshold and the second SCR efficiency being approximatelyat or above the low SCR efficiency threshold; and that the SCR, DOC, andDPF are all in a degraded state based on the first SCR efficiency beingbelow the high SCR efficiency threshold and the second SCR efficiencybeing at or below the low SCR efficiency threshold.

The schematic flow chart diagrams and method schematic diagramsdescribed above are generally set forth as logical flow chart diagrams.As such, the depicted order and labeled steps are indicative ofrepresentative embodiments. Other steps, orderings and methods may beconceived that are equivalent in function, logic, or effect to one ormore steps, or portions thereof, of the methods illustrated in theschematic diagrams.

Additionally, the format and symbols employed are provided to explainthe logical steps of the schematic diagrams and are understood not tolimit the scope of the methods illustrated by the diagrams. Althoughvarious arrow types and line types may be employed in the schematicdiagrams, they are understood not to limit the scope of thecorresponding methods. Indeed, some arrows or other connectors may beused to indicate only the logical flow of a method. For instance, anarrow may indicate a waiting or monitoring period of unspecifiedduration between enumerated steps of a depicted method. Additionally,the order in which a particular method occurs may or may not strictlyadhere to the order of the corresponding steps shown. It will also benoted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart diagrams,and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchartdiagrams, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systemsthat perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of specialpurpose hardware and program code.

Many of the functional units described in this specification have beenlabeled as modules, in order to more particularly emphasize theirimplementation independence. For example, a module may be implemented asa hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits or gate arrays,off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or otherdiscrete components. A module may also be implemented in programmablehardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmablearray logic, programmable logic devices or the like.

Modules may also be implemented in machine-readable medium for executionby various types of processors. An identified module of executable codemay, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks ofcomputer instructions, which may, for instance, be organized as anobject, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, the executables of anidentified module need not be physically located together, but maycomprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which,when joined logically together, comprise the module and achieve thestated purpose for the module.

Indeed, a module of computer readable program code may be a singleinstruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed overseveral different code segments, among different programs, and acrossseveral memory devices. Similarly, operational data may be identifiedand illustrated herein within modules, and may be embodied in anysuitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure.The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may bedistributed over different locations including over different storagedevices, and may exist, at least partially, merely as electronic signalson a system or network. Where a module or portions of a module areimplemented in machine-readable medium (or computer-readable medium),the computer readable program code may be stored and/or propagated on inone or more computer readable medium(s).

The computer readable medium may be a tangible computer readable storagemedium storing the computer readable program code. The computer readablestorage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic,magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, holographic,micromechanical, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or anysuitable combination of the foregoing.

More specific examples of the computer readable medium may include butare not limited to a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a randomaccess memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmableread-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a portable compact discread-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disc (DVD), an opticalstorage device, a magnetic storage device, a holographic storage medium,a micromechanical storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storagemedium may be any tangible medium that can contain, and/or storecomputer readable program code for use by and/or in connection with aninstruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

The computer readable medium may also be a computer readable signalmedium. A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated datasignal with computer readable program code embodied therein, forexample, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagatedsignal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limitedto, electrical, electro-magnetic, magnetic, optical, or any suitablecombination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be anycomputer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage mediumand that can communicate, propagate, or transport computer readableprogram code for use by or in connection with an instruction executionsystem, apparatus, or device. Computer readable program code embodied ona computer readable signal medium may be transmitted using anyappropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline,optical fiber cable, Radio Frequency (RF), or the like, or any suitablecombination of the foregoing.

In one embodiment, the computer readable medium may comprise acombination of one or more computer readable storage mediums and one ormore computer readable signal mediums. For example, computer readableprogram code may be both propagated as an electro-magnetic signalthrough a fiber optic cable for execution by a processor and stored onRAM storage device for execution by the processor.

Computer readable program code for carrying out operations for aspectsof the present invention may be written in any combination of one ormore programming languages, including an object oriented programminglanguage such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventionalprocedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming languageor similar programming languages. The computer readable program code mayexecute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer,as a stand-alone computer-readable package, partly on the user'scomputer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remotecomputer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may beconnected to the user's computer through any type of network, includinga local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or theconnection may be made to an external computer (for example, through theInternet using an Internet Service Provider).

The program code may also be stored in a computer readable medium thatcan direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, orother devices to function in a particular manner, such that theinstructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an articleof manufacture including instructions which implement the function/actspecified in the schematic flowchart diagrams and/or schematic blockdiagrams block or blocks.

Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “anembodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature,structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodimentis included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus,appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” andsimilar language throughout this specification may, but do notnecessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.

Accordingly, the present disclosure may be embodied in other specificforms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics.The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only asillustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the disclosure is,therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoingdescription. All changes which come within the meaning and range ofequivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system, comprising: an engine; an exhaustaftertreatment system in exhaust gas receiving communication with theengine, wherein the exhaust aftertreatment system includes a selectivecatalytic reduction (SCR) system, a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), anda catalyzed diesel particulate filter (DPF); and a controllercommunicably coupled to the engine and the exhaust aftertreatmentsystem, the controller structured to: interpret a first set of NOx data,the first set of NOx data including selective catalytic reduction (SCR)inlet NOx data and SCR outlet NOx data; determine that the exhaustaftertreatment system is purged of a reductant deposit based on thefirst set of NOx data; interpret a second set of NOx data correspondingto an elevated SCR inlet temperature range, the second set of NOx dataincluding SCR inlet NOx data and SCR outlet NOx data; determine a firstSCR efficiency based on the second set of NOx data; reduce a temperatureof the exhaust gas flowing through the exhaust aftertreatment system;interpret a third set of NOx data corresponding to a relatively lowerSCR inlet temperature range, the third set of NOx data including SCRinlet NOx data and SCR outlet NOx data; determine a second SCRefficiency based on the third set of NOx data; and determine a state ofat least one of the DOC, DPF, and SCR system based on the first andsecond SCR efficiencies relative to a low SCR efficiency threshold and ahigh SCR efficiency threshold.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein thecontroller is structured to determine that the SCR system is in adegraded state based on the first SCR efficiency being at or below thelow SCR efficiency threshold.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein thecontroller is structured to determine that the SCR, DOC, and DPF are allin a healthy state based on the first and second SCR efficiencies beingat or above the high SCR efficiency threshold.
 4. The system of claim 1,wherein the controller is structured to determine that only the DOC andDPF are in a degraded state based on the first SCR efficiency being ator above the high SCR efficiency threshold and the second SCR efficiencybeing at or below the low SCR efficiency threshold.
 5. The system ofclaim 1, wherein the controller is structured to determine that the DOC,DPF, and SCR are all in a degraded state based on the first SCRefficiency being below the high SCR efficiency threshold and the secondSCR efficiency being at or below the low SCR efficiency threshold. 6.The system of claim 1, wherein the elevated SCR inlet temperature rangeincludes a range of SCR inlet temperatures from approximately 400degrees Celsius to 550 degrees Celsius, wherein the relatively lower SCRinlet temperature range includes a range of SCR inlet temperatures fromapproximately 225 degrees Celsius to 275 degrees Celsius, wherein thelow SCR efficiency threshold is approximately equal to 0.5, and whereinthe high SCR efficiency threshold is approximately equal to 0.7.
 7. Amethod, comprising: purging an exhaust aftertreatment system of areductant deposit; interpreting a first set of NOx data, the first setof NOx data including selective catalytic reduction (SCR) inlet NOx dataand SCR outlet NOx data; determining that the exhaust aftertreatmentsystem is purged of the reductant deposit based on the first set of NOxdata; interpreting a second set of NOx data corresponding to an elevatedSCR inlet temperature range, the second set of NOx data including SCRinlet NOx data and SCR outlet NOx data; determining a first SCRefficiency based on the second set of NOx data; reducing a temperatureof the exhaust gas flowing through the exhaust aftertreatment system;interpreting a third set of NOx data corresponding to a relatively lowerSCR inlet temperature range, the third set of NOx data including SCRinlet NOx data and SCR outlet NOx data; determining a second SCRefficiency based on the third set of NOx data; and determining a stateof at least one of a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), a dieselparticulate filter (DPF), and a SCR system based on the first and secondSCR efficiencies relative to a low SCR efficiency threshold and a highSCR efficiency threshold.
 8. The method of claim 7, further comprisingdetermining that the SCR system is in a degraded state based on thefirst SCR efficiency being at or below the low SCR efficiency threshold.9. The method of claim 7, further comprising determining that only theDOC and DPF are in a degraded state based on the first SCR efficiencybeing at or above the high SCR efficiency threshold and the second SCRefficiency being at or below the low SCR efficiency threshold.
 10. Themethod of claim 7, further comprising determining that the SCR, DOC, andDPF are all in a healthy state based on the first and second SCRefficiencies being at or above the high SCR efficiency threshold. 11.The method of claim 7, further comprising determining that only the DOCis in a healthy state based on the first SCR efficiency being below thehigh SCR efficiency threshold and the second SCR efficiency being withina marginal SCR efficiency range, wherein the marginal efficiency rangeis above the low SCR efficiency threshold.
 12. The method of claim 7,further comprising determining that the DOC, DPF, and SCR are all in adegraded state based on the first SCR efficiency being below the highSCR efficiency threshold and the second SCR efficiency being at or belowthe low SCR efficiency threshold.
 13. The method of claim 7, wherein theelevated SCR inlet temperature range includes a range of SCR inlettemperatures from approximately 400 degrees Celsius to 550 degreesCelsius, wherein the low SCR inlet temperature range includes a range ofSCR inlet temperatures from approximately 225 degrees Celsius to 275degrees Celsius, wherein the low SCR efficiency threshold isapproximately equal to 0.5, and wherein the high SCR efficiencythreshold is approximately equal to 0.7.
 14. The method of claim 7,wherein the DPF is catalyzed.
 15. An apparatus, comprising an exhaustaftertreatment system including, a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), adiesel particulate filter (DPF), and an SCR system; a controllercommunicably coupled to the exhaust aftertreatment system and includinga dosing module configured to suspend dosing in the exhaustaftertreatment system, a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) inlet NOxmodule configured to interpret SCR inlet NOx data from the SCR inlet NOxsensor and interpret an SCR inlet temperature, a SCR outlet NOx moduleconfigured to interpret SCR outlet NOx data from the SCR outlet NOxsensor, and a system diagnostic module configured to determine anefficiency of the SCR system based on the SCR inlet and outlet NOx dataover a range of SCR inlet temperatures, and reduce a temperature of anexhaust gas flowing through the exhaust aftertreatment system, whereinthe system diagnostic module is further configured to determine a stateof at least one of the diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), the dieselparticulate filter (DPF), and the SCR system based on the SCR efficiencyat an elevated SCR inlet temperature range and the SCR efficiency at arelatively lower SCR inlet temperature range relative to a high SCRefficiency threshold and a low SCR efficiency threshold.
 16. Theapparatus of claim 15, wherein the elevated SCR inlet temperature rangeincludes a range of SCR inlet temperatures from approximately 400degrees Celsius to 550 degrees Celsius, wherein the low SCR inlettemperature range includes a range of SCR inlet temperatures fromapproximately 225 degrees Celsius to 275 degrees Celsius, wherein thelow SCR efficiency threshold is approximately equal to 0.5, and whereinthe high SCR efficiency threshold is approximately equal to 0.7.
 17. Theapparatus of claim 16, wherein the system diagnostic module isconfigured to determine that the SCR system is in a degraded state basedon the first SCR efficiency being at or below the low SCR efficiencythreshold.
 18. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the system diagnosticmodule is configured to determine that the SCR, DOC, and DPF are all ina healthy state based on the first and second SCR efficiencies being ator above the high SCR efficiency threshold.
 19. The apparatus of claim16, wherein the system diagnostic module is configured to determine thatonly the DOC and DPF are in a degraded state based on the first SCRefficiency being at or above the high SCR efficiency threshold and thesecond SCR efficiency being at or below the low SCR efficiencythreshold.
 20. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the system diagnosticmodule is configured to determine that the DOC, DPF, and SCR are all ina degraded state based on the first SCR efficiency being below the highSCR efficiency threshold and the second SCR efficiency being at or belowthe low SCR efficiency threshold.